Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
MG Maestro MOT Results
65.6% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the MG Maestro is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.6% fail on All position lamps
- 1.6% fail on Front lamps
- 4.9% fail on Battery
-
4.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.9% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Tell tale
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Hazard warning
- 3.3% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
4.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.9% fail on Component mounting
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.9% fail on Emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.6% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Windscreen
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
-
4.9% fail on
Brakes
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.6% fail on Rear wheels
-
1.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.6% fail on
Components
- 1.6% fail on Hoses
-
1.6% fail on
Components
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.6% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
-
3.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Chassis
-
1.6% fail on
Load security
- 1.6% fail on Tailgate
-
1.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
MG Maestro and Maestro Turbo 1983
Good to drive, quick and economical