Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Land Rover Defender 130 MOT Results
64.2% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 130 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.8% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.8% fail on Individual lamps
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.9% fail on Switch
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Tell tale
- 3.8% fail on Horn
- 1.9% fail on Battery
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.9% fail on Lamp
-
7.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.8% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting
- 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Panhard rods
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Axles
- 1.9% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Rear
-
1.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
5.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.7% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on Hoses
- 1.9% fail on Pipes
-
5.7% fail on
Components
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake drums
- 1.9% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
- 1.9% fail on Locking devices
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Steering
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
-
1.9% fail on
Free play
- 1.9% fail on Steering box
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 1.9% fail on Drag link end
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.9% fail on Steering arm
-
1.9% fail on
Free play
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
- 1.9% fail on Other components
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
7.5% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.8% fail on System (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Tank
- 1.9% fail on Cap
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.5% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Windscreen
- 1.9% fail on Mirrors
-
7.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.8% fail on Chassis
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
- 1.9% fail on Passengers other
-
1.9% fail on
Seats
- 1.9% fail on Drivers
-
3.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
3.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate