Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Humber Sceptre MOT Results

74.8% pass rate
from 226 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Humber Sceptre is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Tell tales (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.88% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 0.44% fail on Battery
    • 0.44% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.44% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.2% fail on Components
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.44% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.44% fail on Pipes
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.1% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.1% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.88% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.44% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.44% fail on Shackle
    • 0.44% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.44% fail on Front
  • 5.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Drivers
    • 0.44% fail on Load security
      • 0.44% fail on Bootlid
  • 5.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
  • 4.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Pipe
      • 0.44% fail on Hose
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Steering box
      • 0.44% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.44% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review