MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Honda » CR-X
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Honda CR-X MOT Results

69.0% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2020
(12% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-X is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (88% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Axles
      • 1.7% fail on Stub axle
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 10% fail on Visibility (66% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Washers (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
  • 8.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (54% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (65% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.7% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (73% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Floor
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.9% fail on Steering (85% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.4% fail on Brakes (63% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (22% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (33% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review