Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Alfa Romeo GT Junior MOT Results
65.0% pass rate
from 103 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT Junior is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
8.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.97% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.97% fail on Tell tales
-
8.7% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.97% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 2.9% fail on Battery
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Horn
-
0.97% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.97% fail on Lamp
-
8.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.8% fail on Washers
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Windscreen (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
- 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.97% fail on Front
- 0.97% fail on Rear
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting
-
0.97% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.97% fail on Location
-
0.97% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.97% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
7.8% fail on
Brakes
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
- 1.9% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
-
0.97% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.97% fail on
Components
- 0.97% fail on Servos
-
0.97% fail on
Components
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
4.9% fail on
Doors
(7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Passengers front (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Drivers (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Passengers (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Body condition
-
4.9% fail on
Doors
(7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.9% fail on Emissions
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.97% fail on Steering box
-
0.97% fail on
Steering control
- 0.97% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.97% fail on Steering operation
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
2.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate