Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Alfa Romeo GT Junior MOT Results

65.0% pass rate
from 103 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT Junior is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.97% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.97% fail on Tell tales
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.97% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.97% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.9% fail on Battery
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Horn
    • 0.97% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.97% fail on Lamp
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Washers
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Windscreen (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Suspension
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.97% fail on Front
      • 0.97% fail on Rear
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.97% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.97% fail on Location
    • 0.97% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.97% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
        • 1.9% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.97% fail on Components
        • 0.97% fail on Servos
  • 7.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.9% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Passengers front (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Drivers (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Passengers (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.97% fail on Steering box
    • 0.97% fail on Steering control
      • 0.97% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.97% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate