Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

46.3% pass rate
from 67 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 31% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 22% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 9.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 12% fail on Rbt
          • 12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.5% fail on Load sensing valves (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.5% fail on Lever
  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 9.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 6.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 9.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.0% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Horn
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.5% fail on Switch
  • 27% fail on Suspension (79% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.0% fail on Springs
      • 3.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 27% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 10% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Chassis
      • 6.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission
      • 6.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.0% fail on Joints
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 1.5% fail on Pillar
      • 1.5% fail on Other body component
    • 1.5% fail on Cabs
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 19% fail on Visibility
    • 12% fail on Wipers
    • 9.0% fail on Washers
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition (9 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Emissions not tested (18 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 7.5% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 1.5% fail on Other leaks
  • 9.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Steering box
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Steering play
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Requirements
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment