Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Citroen C25 MOT Results

49.1% pass rate
from 116 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (89% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 17% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 17% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 7.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.0% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.7% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.86% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.86% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.86% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.86% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.86% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.86% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.86% fail on Joints
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.86% fail on Chassis
      • 0.86% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.86% fail on Body
      • 0.86% fail on Panel
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.86% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Load sensing valves (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.86% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.86% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Air and vacuum systems (11 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Operation
      • 0.86% fail on Servos
    • 0.86% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.86% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.86% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.86% fail on Steering wheel
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Attachment
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.86% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 2.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.6% fail on Engine oil leaks