MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » BMW » 5-Series
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

BMW 5-Series MOT Results

73.2% pass rate
from 829 tests in 2021
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 5-Series is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (72% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.97% fail on Horn
      • 0.60% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.24% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension (57% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (60% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (90% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (24 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (55% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.36% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.24% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.24% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.24% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.12% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.97% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.72% fail on Transmission
      • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Joints
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.72% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.36% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Floor
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.60% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.24% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.24% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.36% fail on Steering box
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering box
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.12% fail on Steering column
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
  • 1.1% fail on Tyres
    • 0.60% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review